- CORRESPONDENCE
- 14 April 2026
By
-
Jamie E. Bloss
-
East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
-
-
Kerry A. Sewell
-
East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
-
-
Joseph G. L. Lee
-
Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
-
We agree with your Career feature describing librarians as “key research partners” (see Nature 650, 1063–1065; 2026). We would like to push back against the widespread perception that librarians are only service providers. They should also be valued for their disciplinary expertise and viewpoints. An example is J.E.B., who joined research projects as a team member and co-author owing to their knowledge of content about consumer health and digital literacy (J. G. L. Lee et al. Public Health Rep. https://doi.org/qz3v (2024) and H. Gordon et al. Health Info. Libr. J. 41, 195–200; 2024).
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$32.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
Nature 652, 828 (2026)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-026-01217-0
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Why every scientist needs a librarian
How to make data open? Stop overlooking librarians